Date: Mon 05 Nov 2018

D (A child : parental alienation) [2018] EWFC B64 (19 October 2018)

Before His Honour Judge Clifford Bellamy

This private law Children Act application relates to a teenage boy, D. D is aged 13. On 23rd November 2016 his mother applied to the court to vary a residence order, originally made in 2008, and for a child arrangements order providing that D should live with her. The father immediately responded by issuing an application for a specific issue order seeking the return of D to his care. D is a party to these proceedings and a children’s guardian (‘the guardian’) has been appointed for him. The applications come before me now for a finding of fact hearing. This is my judgment relating to fact finding issues

In the light of those ‘typical behaviours’ displayed by D, I am satisfied on the simple balance of probability that D has become alienated from his father.

I am equally satisfied that the cause of D becoming alienated from his father is the mother’s behaviour as I have described it in this judgment. I am concerned that some responsibility may also attach to her partner, T, though as he has not provided any evidence, written or oral, it is not possible for me to make a finding on that point.

I have no difficulty at all in making those two findings. It is the third question that is the most difficult. Has D become alienated from his father as a result of a deliberate course of conduct by the mother or has she unwittingly behaved in a way that has caused the alienation? I have reflected very carefully on that issue. The assessment and prediction made by Recorder McLaren QC, albeit some nine years ago, have proved to be remarkably accurate. The mother has always had a burning desire that D should live with her. She has not let the truth stand in the way of her ambition. Neither, I fear, has she allowed consideration of the potential harm to D that would likely be caused by the obsessive pursuit of her ambition stand in her way. I am satisfied that in this case this mother has deliberately alienated D from his father. I find accordingly.

For the full Judgement please click here
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/OJ/2018/B64.html

Privacy and GDPR

How we use your contact information

Due to the new GDPR Law coming into effect in March 2018, we have changed the way we ask for your information.

Venters Solicitors records your contact information for one purpose: To respond to your enquiries and follow up potentially with legal advice

Venters Solicitors does not give this information to any third-party organisation. If you wish to have your information permanently deleted from our database, please email here. We reserve the right to make a small charge for this process.

If you are happy to for us to respond to you via email, simply click the slider to "yes" on the form. If you don’t do this you will not receive emails from us.

Cookie Policy

A cookie is a small data file containing a single number (and no personal information) this cookie is never re-used on this web site or by third parties. When you close your browser (Internet Explorer/Firefox/Safari etc), the cookie is destroyed.

We also use Google Analytics on our web sites to count traffic visiting the site and to give us information in how we can improve the visitor experience. This cookie does not know or record any of your personal information, it merely records which pages are visited.This site uses cookies. Cookies are small data tokens that are used to pass information from page to page as you visit a web site.

Contact Info
  • Address: 213 Camberwell Road, London SE5 0HG
  • Phone: 020 7277 0110
  • Email: Info@venters.co.uk